University of Kabianga Repository

Wildlife Population Change in Africa from the Eyes of the Public—The Case of Mara Enoonkishu Conservancy in Southern Kenya

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Masiga, Dorothy Syallow
dc.contributor.author Mwaura, Francis
dc.contributor.author Mukhovi, Mikalitsa S.
dc.date.accessioned 2023-09-04T07:47:16Z
dc.date.available 2023-09-04T07:47:16Z
dc.date.issued 2016-07-20
dc.identifier.citation Masiga, D. S., Mwaura, F., & Mukhovi, M. S. (2016). Wildlife Population Change in Africa from the Eyes of the Public—The Case of Mara Enoonkishu Conservancy in Southern Kenya. Natural Resources, 7(7), 434-444. en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/nr.2016.77038
dc.identifier.uri http://ir-library.kabianga.ac.ke/handle/123456789/681
dc.description Article Research on Wildlife Population Change in Africa from the Eyes of the Public en_US
dc.description.abstract The aims of the study were to: 1) determine the wildlife population trends in the Mara Enoonkishu Conservancy from the eyes and minds of the public, 2) assess the recent trends in wildlife popula tions based on actual scientific counts, and 3) compare the two patterns and establish whether they are similar or not. The solicitation of public views was based on household surveys using a standard questionnaire which was administered to 115 randomly selected respondents. The do minant wildlife species according to 39% of the respondents was the elephant followed by the ze bra with 35%. 40% of the respondents indicated that the rhino population had declined followed by wild dogs (7%) and cheetah (6%). The actual counts showed that the herbivores with increas ing populations included the rhino (r2 = 0.9992), impala (r2 = 0.9824), Thomson’s gazelle (r2 = 0.6965), Grant’s gazelle (r2 = 0.7052), elephant (r2 = 0.5798), and topi (r2 = 0.4426) while the in creasing predators included the lion (r2 = 1.000), cheetah (r2 = 0.9093) and hyena (r2 = 0.8462). The actual wildlife counts appeared to tally with the public views only for the elephant and zebra. The actual counts contradicted the public views in terms of the rhino, lion and gazelles whose numbers were on the increase but the people did not appear to notice. Based on this, it was con cluded that the public view on the wildlife population trend was not similar to the actual wildlife population status on the ground based on scientific monitoring. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Natural Resources en_US
dc.subject Wildlife Population Change en_US
dc.subject Animal Counts en_US
dc.subject Public Perception en_US
dc.title Wildlife Population Change in Africa from the Eyes of the Public—The Case of Mara Enoonkishu Conservancy in Southern Kenya en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Browse

My Account