dc.contributor.author |
Masiga, Dorothy Syallow |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Mwaura, Francis |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Mukhovi, Mikalitsa S. |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2023-09-04T07:47:16Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2023-09-04T07:47:16Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2016-07-20 |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
Masiga, D. S., Mwaura, F., & Mukhovi, M. S. (2016). Wildlife Population Change in Africa from the Eyes of the Public—The Case of Mara Enoonkishu Conservancy in Southern Kenya. Natural Resources, 7(7), 434-444. |
en_US |
dc.identifier.uri |
http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/nr.2016.77038 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://ir-library.kabianga.ac.ke/handle/123456789/681 |
|
dc.description |
Article Research on Wildlife Population Change in Africa from
the Eyes of the Public |
en_US |
dc.description.abstract |
The aims of the study were to: 1) determine the wildlife population trends in the Mara Enoonkishu
Conservancy from the eyes and minds of the public, 2) assess the recent trends in wildlife popula tions based on actual scientific counts, and 3) compare the two patterns and establish whether
they are similar or not. The solicitation of public views was based on household surveys using a
standard questionnaire which was administered to 115 randomly selected respondents. The do minant wildlife species according to 39% of the respondents was the elephant followed by the ze bra with 35%. 40% of the respondents indicated that the rhino population had declined followed
by wild dogs (7%) and cheetah (6%). The actual counts showed that the herbivores with increas ing populations included the rhino (r2 = 0.9992), impala (r2 = 0.9824), Thomson’s gazelle (r2 =
0.6965), Grant’s gazelle (r2 = 0.7052), elephant (r2 = 0.5798), and topi (r2 = 0.4426) while the in creasing predators included the lion (r2 = 1.000), cheetah (r2 = 0.9093) and hyena (r2 = 0.8462).
The actual wildlife counts appeared to tally with the public views only for the elephant and zebra.
The actual counts contradicted the public views in terms of the rhino, lion and gazelles whose
numbers were on the increase but the people did not appear to notice. Based on this, it was con cluded that the public view on the wildlife population trend was not similar to the actual wildlife
population status on the ground based on scientific monitoring. |
en_US |
dc.language.iso |
en |
en_US |
dc.publisher |
Natural Resources |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Wildlife Population Change |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Animal Counts |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Public Perception |
en_US |
dc.title |
Wildlife Population Change in Africa from the Eyes of the Public—The Case of Mara Enoonkishu Conservancy in Southern Kenya |
en_US |
dc.type |
Article |
en_US |