“We Work Together for Our Common Well-being”: A Critique of Paul F. Knitter’s  Soteriocentrism

dc.contributor.author	Rop, Naaman Kipsigei
dc.date.accessioned	2023-07-31T08:35:55Z
dc.date.available	2023-07-31T08:35:55Z
dc.date.issued	2015-08
dc.identifier.citation	Kipsigei, R. N. “We Work Together for Our Common Well-being”: A Critique of Paul F. Knitter’s Soteriocentrism. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 4(2).	en_US
dc.identifier.issn	2039-2117
dc.identifier.uri	10.5901/mjss.2013.v4n2p221
dc.identifier.uri	http://ir-library.kabianga.ac.ke/handle/123456789/622
dc.description	Article on Common Well-being	en_US
dc.description.abstract	The issue of interfaith dialogue has been the preoccupation of the church from time immemorial. This article therefore examines an a soteriocentrism of Paul F. Knitter. This work explores the concept of soteriocentrism and critiques it in the light of Jacque Dupui’s theocentric model. It serves to show that all the above approaches are not sufficient in each other but they all serves a purpose of complimentarily.	en_US
dc.language.iso	en	en_US
dc.publisher	Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences	en_US
dc.subject	Soteriocentricism	en_US
dc.subject	Theocetricism	en_US
dc.subject	Interfaith dialogue	en_US
dc.title	“We Work Together for Our Common Well-being”: A Critique of Paul F. Knitter’s Soteriocentrism	en_US
dc.type	Article	en_US